ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Conservative Treatment of Pediatric Fractures-Narrative Review of Acceptable Deformity and Remodeling Potential.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures are among the most common injuries in childhood, yet the immature skeleton differs fundamentally from the adult skeleton. A thick periosteum, open physes, and a powerful capacity for remodeling mean that most pediatric fractures unite and realign without surgery. Despite this, national registries document an increasing use of operative fixation, including in some fracture groups with substantial remodeling potential. This narrative review synthesizes the contemporary evidence on the limits within which fractures throughout the growing skeleton can be treated conservatively. The literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. For each region we summarize the accepted thresholds of angulation, rotation, shortening, and displacement, together with the age- and site-specific modifiers that determine whether a deformity will remodel, and we present these thresholds in comparative tables. We also delineate the genuine indications for surgical treatment, so that the boundary between conservative and surgical management is defined rather than blurred. A secure command of these region-specific limits lets the treating physician exploit the child's remarkable remodeling potential and avoid both under- and over-treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.