ArticleMethods and protocols2026
Wheel Diameter Affects Vibration Transmission but Not Performance During Uphill and Downhill Mountain Biking over Rough Terrain.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mountain biking over rough terrain exposes riders to vibrations that may affect comfort, health, bicycle control, and performance. This study analyzed the effect of wheel diameter on vibration transmission and performance during a short uphill and downhill test over rocky terrain. Forty-nine highly trained male mountain bikers completed repeated trials using two equivalent hardtail mountain bikes with 26- and 29-inch wheels. Vibrations were recorded with eight triaxial accelerometers placed on the bicycle and rider, and performance was assessed using an electronic photocell timing system. Both wheel sizes showed a similar vibration pattern, with lower root mean square (RMS) acceleration values at the helmet and coccyx and higher values at the wrists and ankles. However, wheel diameter significantly influenced vibration transmission. During the uphill test, the 26-inch bicycle produced higher accelerations at the coccyx and rear hub, whereas during the downhill test, the 29-inch bicycle transmitted greater vibrations to the rider's wrists and ankles. No significant differences were observed between wheel sizes in the time required to complete either the uphill or downhill tests. These findings suggest that, in short and highly irregular uphill and downhill sections, 29-inch wheels do not necessarily improve performance over 26-inch wheels, although they modify the distribution of vibrations transmitted to the rider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.