ReviewMarine drugs2026
Marine-Derived Natural Products Against Flaviviruses: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Future Directions.
Review in Marine drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although flaviviruses, including DENV, ZIKV and JEV, remain important causes of febrile, congenital, and neurological diseases, treatment options remain largely supportive, with limited availability of virus-specific antiviral therapies. Marine organisms and marine-derived microorganisms produce chemically distinct antiviral materials, including sulfated polysaccharides, terpenoids, alkaloids, peptides, cyclodepsipeptides, and polyketides. However, their activities range from preliminary extract-level inhibition to direct biochemical target validation, making mechanistic comparison difficult. This review critically evaluates marine-derived anti-flaviviral agents using two complementary dimensions, the infection stage implicated by experimental assays and the strength of evidence supporting that assignment. DENV evidence is dominated by sulfated algal macromolecules that interfere with adsorption or internalization, whereas ZIKV studies encompass lipophilic algal metabolites, fungal alkaloids, cyclodepsipeptides, and a few target-oriented candidates. Across the field, most reports remain stage-associated rather than target-validated. Cross-study potency comparisons are constrained by differences in virus strains, cell models, assay formats, and treatment schedules. JEV-specific evidence is particularly sparse. Based on the DENV and ZIKV evidence map, we propose concise priorities for JEV-oriented discovery: early compound-level dereplication, parallel cytotoxicity testing, orthogonal confirmation of productive infection, stage-resolved assays, and biochemical or genetic validation of conserved flaviviral targets. This evidence-based framework can help distinguish promising chemical candidate scaffolds from preliminary antiviral signals and guide mechanism-informed development of marine-derived natural products against flaviviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.