ReviewNeurology international2026
Care Strategies in Emergency Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.
Review in Neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Coordinated care delivered through protocol-driven multidisciplinary teams enables rapid diagnosis and treatment, both of which are essential for improving clinical outcomes.
objectiveOur objective was to analyze care strategies in the emergency management of acute ischemic stroke, focusing on treatment times and influencing factors, interventions implemented in emergency settings and their impact on clinical outcomes, and the contribution of healthcare professionals to optimizing stroke care.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 Statement. Current evidence published between 2021 and 2026 was retrieved from five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and SciELO. Eligibility criteria were applied, and methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using validated appraisal tools.
resultsFourteen studies involving a total of 6384 patients were included. Factors such as healthcare system reorganization, multidisciplinary teamwork, early protocol activation, and the use of stroke-specific triage scales significantly influenced treatment times. Coordinated and protocolized care pathways, together with evidence-based clinical interventions, were consistently associated with higher thrombolysis rates and shorter treatment times, while improvements in neurological and functional recovery were reported in several, but not all, studies. The integration of specialized stroke professionals and structured emergency care processes contributed to reducing treatment delays and improving patient outcomes.
conclusionsCritical treatment times in acute ischemic stroke are influenced by multiple factors, and targeted organizational and clinical strategies can accelerate diagnosis and treatment. Although improvements in clinical outcomes were not consistently demonstrated across all included studies, the available evidence consistently supports protocol-driven multidisciplinary emergency care as an effective strategy for reducing treatment delays and optimizing acute ischemic stroke management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.