Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42646180›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2026

Advances in Machine Learning-Enhanced PBPK Models for Brain-Targeted Drug Delivery via Nanocarriers: A Comprehensive Review.

Hanwen Hu, Ya Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanwen HuJ. Mike Walker '66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-3983
Ya WangJ. Mike Walker '66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanostructured drug-delivery materials-liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, and inorganic carriers-have become central to pharmaceutical strategies for crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), where most candidate therapeutics fail to reach their targets. Their biological performance hinges on a coupled chain of vascular transport, BBB translocation, tissue diffusion, cellular uptake, and intracellular release, each of which is shaped by the nanocarrier's size, surface chemistry, charge, and ligand functionalization. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models describe this chain mechanistically but are limited by parameter uncertainty, simplified representations of the BBB, and coarse regional resolution. Machine learning (ML) can close these gaps by extracting nonlinear structure-transport-exposure relationships from heterogeneous experimental and clinical datasets. This review examines emerging ML-PBPK hybrid frameworks for predicting the brain biodistribution of nanostructured drug carriers. We compare regression, kernel, and deep learning approaches for parameter inference, model correction, and surrogate modeling; assess strategies for feature selection, uncertainty quantification, and interpretability; and discuss documented failure cases that bound the conditions under which these methods can be trusted. The review closes with recommendations on dataset standardization, software platform selection, and the responsible use of generative AI in pharmaceutical modeling, thus providing guidance for translating nanostructured material design into safer, more effective brain-targeted therapies.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrierbrain-targeted deliverydrug-loaded nanocarriersmachine learningML–PBPK hybrid modelsnanostructured drug-delivery systemspharmaceutical nanomedicinephysiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling

Identifiers

PMID42646180
PMCPMC13513963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.