ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical and Economic Trade-Offs in Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: A Markov Model-Based Analysis.
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis are life-threatening fungal infections characterized by high early mortality, substantial toxicity, and intensive healthcare resource utilization. While multiple antifungal therapies are recommended in international guidelines, their comparative clinical and economic value remains uncertain, particularly in resource-limited settings. We developed a hybrid decision tree and Markov model to evaluate antifungal strategies, including liposomal amphotericin B, isavuconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and caspofungin, from the perspective of the Colombian healthcare system over a 6-month horizon. Health states included clinical response, treatment failure, toxicity, and death. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and net monetary benefit (NMB). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. In invasive aspergillosis, isavuconazole provided a modest incremental benefit over voriconazole (+0.022 QALYs), driven primarily by improved tolerability, at an incremental cost of COP 3.4 million, yielding an ICER of COP 154.5 million/QALY. In mucormycosis, liposomal amphotericin B yielded greater survival benefits (+0.035 QALYs) but at substantially higher costs (ICER: COP 494.3 million/QALY). Across willingness-to-pay thresholds, isavuconazole and voriconazole demonstrated more favorable economic profiles, owing to lower toxicity and reduced hospitalizations. These findings highlight that the clinical-economic value of antifungal therapy is primarily determined by early survival gains, toxicity burden, and front-loaded costs. Strategies minimizing toxicity and hospitalization appear more efficient in constrained health systems, whereas survival-maximizing approaches may be justified in severe disease. This integrated analysis supports context-specific antifungal decision-making in the management of invasive fungal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.