Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645983›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Understanding Trade-Offs in Continuous Neural Representations for Diffeomorphic Image Registration: A Comparative Study of Implicit Neural Representations and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations.

Salvador Rodriguez-Sanz, Carlos Paesa-Lia, Monica Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salvador Rodriguez-SanzAragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza (UZ), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Carlos Paesa-LiaAragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza (UZ), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-0016-0650
Monica HernandezAragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza (UZ), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-5852

Funding

European Union CLASiK - PCI2025-167187-2European Union Satellite Centre HORIZON-MSCA-2024-SE-01 G.A. 10123661Gobierno de Aragón ECU/1871/2023Gobierno de Aragón PROY_B50_24Gobierno de Aragón T64_23RInstituto de Salud Carlos III RD24/0007/0022Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-138703OB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2023-148219OB-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-rigid image registration is a fundamental problem in medical imaging and a representative example of continuous transformation modeling in image processing. Diffeomorphic registration methods, such as Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) and its PDE-constrained variants (PDE-LDDMM), provide mathematically grounded formulations with strong geometric guarantees for transformation quality. However, existing approaches face persistent trade-offs between numerical stability, accuracy, and computational efficiency. Recent work has explored implicit neural representations (INRs) and neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) as flexible neural representations for modeling continuous transformations. Despite their increasing adoption, their practical behavior and limitations in diffeomorphic registration remain insufficiently understood. In this paper, we present a unified formulation of INR- and NODE-based registration methods within LDDMM and PDE-LDDMM, enabling a systematic and controlled comparison across architectures, sampling strategies, and numerical solvers. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between these approaches. In particular, we show that MLP-based INR formulations introduce significant computational overhead and rely on sampling strategies that can degrade smoothness and lead to the increased occurrence of non-diffeomorphic transformations at higher resolutions. Moreover, these approximations do not fully alleviate the computational cost, with some variants exceeding the costs of expensive classical optimization-based methods. In contrast, NODE-based formulations and downsampling strategies consistently provide transformations with more controlled Jacobian extrema while maintaining competitive computational performance. Among the evaluated methods, the original NODE-LDDMM and NODE-PDE-LDDMM formulations achieve the most favorable trade-offs between registration accuracy, geometric consistency, and computational efficiency. These findings provide clear insights into the design of neural representations for continuous transformation modeling, with practical implications for diffeomorphic registration and computational anatomy applications.

Indexed as

continuous transformation modelingdiffeomorphic image registrationimplicit neural representations (INRs)Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM)neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs)neural representations

Identifiers

PMID42645983
PMCPMC13514420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.