ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Realistic Ultrasound Simulations of Healthy and Osteoarthritic Cartilage.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) causes irreversible cartilage damage, highlighting the need for early and sensitive assessment. Current imaging modalities are limited in detecting early-stage changes. Ultrasound (US) provides a non-invasive and accessible alternative, but its clinical adoption is limited by the lack of standardized protocols and reliable cartilage assessment. Simulations can be used to address these challenges by enabling system design, acquisition optimization and validation by providing ground truth when in vivo ground truth is unavailable. The aim of this study is to develop an in silico framework for realistic US imaging of healthy and OA cartilage by combining accurate acoustic wave modeling with a 2D microstructural cartilage phantom. The model was calibrated to healthy cartilage using first-order speckle statistics and extended to simulate degeneration through changes in structural and acoustic properties. As a proof-of-concept study, simulations were evaluated against limited ex vivo US data from healthy and OA cartilage and compared with literature data. The simulations reproduced key OA-related features and trends, including changes in reflection coefficient (R), integrated reflection coefficient (IRC), apparent integrated backscatter (AIB), and gray level distributions. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using microstructure-based tissue phantoms to model healthy and OA cartilage. The framework provides a platform for systematic investigation of cartilage microstructure and US-derived features and may support future generation of synthetic datasets for data-driven and AI-based OA assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.