ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A Two-Stage Ensemble Machine Learning Pipeline for Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Digital Mammograms.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and early detection through mammography is essential for reducing mortality. Artificial intelligence can support radiologists by improving diagnostic accuracy. To develop and evaluate a two-stage ensemble machine learning pipeline for breast cancer diagnosis from digital mammograms. The proposed framework combines image preprocessing, multiple convolutional neural networks trained under different conditions, and a second-stage classifier that integrates the CNN outputs. Several machine learning models and feature selection techniques were evaluated using publicly available mammography datasets. Results: The ensemble approach consistently outperformed the individual CNN models. The MLP classifier achieved the best overall balance between precision and recall, while the heuristic fusion method provided the highest sensitivity. Feature selection reduced model complexity while maintaining comparable performance, and cross-validation confirmed the robustness of the proposed methodology. Combining complementary information from multiple CNNs with classical machine learning improves diagnostic performance and provides a robust framework for computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis. The proposed two-stage ensemble offers an effective and interpretable approach for mammographic breast cancer classification. A demonstration application incorporating Grad-CAM explainability further supports its potential use as a clinical decision-support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.