Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645972›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Exploring Prototype Networks for Surgical Vision: Interpretability and Performance in Semantic Segmentation and Surgical Phase Recognition.

Yiping Li, Ronald L P D de Jong, Franco Badaloni, Gino M Kuiper, Romy C van Jaarsveld, Jelle P Ruurda, Marcel Breeuwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiping LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-0239-3682
Ronald L P D de JongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-7806-4340
Franco BadaloniDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7387-6893
Gino M KuiperDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Romy C van JaarsveldDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-1677
Marcel BreeuwerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AP Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-8970

Funding

Eindhoven University of Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based surgical vision systems achieve strong performance in semantic segmentation and phase recognition, but their black-box nature limits traceability in safety-critical clinical settings. Prototype-based networks offer an interpretable alternative by grounding predictions in learned visual exemplars, yet their suitability for surgical video understanding remains insufficiently characterized. We adapted a prototype-based architecture to two surgical datasets, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), and benchmarked it against conventional baselines. We evaluated a segmentation-only setting, in which prototype size and capacity were ablated, and a multitask setting, in which three strategies for coupling prototype learning to semantic segmentation and surgical phase recognition were compared. Prototype-based models underperformed the conventional baselines across both tasks and datasets. In the segmentation-only setting, the selected prototype configurations achieved Dice scores of 72.23% on Cholecystectomy and 72.07% on RAMIE, compared with 74.35% and 74.02% for the corresponding conventional baselines, and showed weaker boundary agreement. In the multitask setting, the best prototype strategy recovered competitive segmentation performance but remained 6-12 F1 points below the conventional baseline for phase recognition. Qualitatively, prototype activation maps exposed intra-structure decompositions and contextual cues that are not directly available from black-box baselines. Prototype networks provide spatially traceable evidence for surgical scene understanding, but currently trade interpretability for reduced boundary precision and phase-recognition performance. These findings motivate future work on scene-level and temporally aware prototypes for explainable surgical AI.

Indexed as

explainable AIinterpretable deep learninglaparoscopic cholecystectomymultitask learningprototype networksrobot-assisted surgerysemantic segmentationsurgical phase recognitionsurgical scene understanding

Identifiers

PMID42645972
PMCPMC13514770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.