ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Exploring Prototype Networks for Surgical Vision: Interpretability and Performance in Semantic Segmentation and Surgical Phase Recognition.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning-based surgical vision systems achieve strong performance in semantic segmentation and phase recognition, but their black-box nature limits traceability in safety-critical clinical settings. Prototype-based networks offer an interpretable alternative by grounding predictions in learned visual exemplars, yet their suitability for surgical video understanding remains insufficiently characterized. We adapted a prototype-based architecture to two surgical datasets, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), and benchmarked it against conventional baselines. We evaluated a segmentation-only setting, in which prototype size and capacity were ablated, and a multitask setting, in which three strategies for coupling prototype learning to semantic segmentation and surgical phase recognition were compared. Prototype-based models underperformed the conventional baselines across both tasks and datasets. In the segmentation-only setting, the selected prototype configurations achieved Dice scores of 72.23% on Cholecystectomy and 72.07% on RAMIE, compared with 74.35% and 74.02% for the corresponding conventional baselines, and showed weaker boundary agreement. In the multitask setting, the best prototype strategy recovered competitive segmentation performance but remained 6-12 F1 points below the conventional baseline for phase recognition. Qualitatively, prototype activation maps exposed intra-structure decompositions and contextual cues that are not directly available from black-box baselines. Prototype networks provide spatially traceable evidence for surgical scene understanding, but currently trade interpretability for reduced boundary precision and phase-recognition performance. These findings motivate future work on scene-level and temporally aware prototypes for explainable surgical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.