ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Evaluating the Number of Trials for Stable Virtual Reality-Based Subjective Visual Vertical Measurement in Healthy Adults.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality-based subjective visual vertical (VR-SVV) has attracted attention as a potential solution to equipment-related limitations of conventional SVV testing. This study investigated the test-retest reliability and adequate trial number for stable assessment of vertical perception using VR-SVV in healthy adults. Participants performed 10 trials in a VR-SVV test and repeated the assessment after one week. SVV orientation and SVV variability were calculated. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [1,2]), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.