ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Benchmarking Deep Learning for NSCLC PET/CT Segmentation on a Histologically Confirmed Vietnamese Dataset: Validation and Generalization.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an essential prerequisite for automated metabolic tumor volume (MTV) quantification and staging. Although deep learning models achieve high performance on large-scale datasets, their generalization across different clinical domains is limited by variations in imaging protocols and patient demographics. This study aims to evaluate several deep learning architectures and investigate a transfer learning strategy to mitigate domain shift. Three architectures, including ResNet-backbone 3D U-Net, nnU-Net v2, and Swin UNETR, were benchmarked from scratch and compared with a fine-tuned nnU-Net initialized with AutoPET II weights. Results on the internal dataset showed that the fine-tuned nnU-Net achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 83.4 ± 6.5%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of 5.1 ± 3.6 mm, and a precision of 89.6 ± 8.2%. Compared to the nnU-Net v2, the fine-tuned nnU-Net improved the absolute DSC by 6.8% while reducing local training time by 37.5% by bypassing the initial feature-learning phase. The fine-tuned nnU-Net model also demonstrated a high correlation between the MTV and the ground truth (Pearson
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.