ArticleJournal of imaging2026
MB-SwinRefiner: Mammographic Mass Segmentation with Probability-Guided Residual Refinement.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate mammographic mass segmentation is crucial for computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis, but remains challenging because masses may be small, low-contrast, irregularly shaped, and partially obscured by dense fibroglandular tissue. Although recent methods have improved contextual representation and multi-scale feature extraction, reliable segmentation still requires better integration of lesion-scale representation, contour-derived auxiliary supervision, and local probability-map refinement. This paper proposes MB-SwinRefiner, a novel two-stage framework consisting of a Multi-scale Boundary-aware SwinUNet (MB-SwinUNet) stage and a probability-guided residual refinement stage. The first stage, MB-SwinUNet, generates an initial mass probability map using hierarchical Swin encoding, multi-scale decoder fusion, and training-only auxiliary boundary supervision. The second stage refines this prediction through probability-guided residual correction by using the Stage 1 probability map as a prior and learning logit-space corrections. Experiments were conducted on a case-level five-fold cross-validation of the INbreast dataset under both a resized benchmark setting and a native sliding-window full-mammogram setting. Performance was evaluated using Dice, intersection over union, sensitivity, and specificity. In the resized benchmark setting, MB-SwinRefiner achieved Dice of 86.19%, IoU of 84.33%, sensitivity of 89.34%, and specificity of 99.98%. In the native sliding-window setting, MB-SwinRefiner improved mean Dice from 76.64% to 78.06% and mean IoU from 74.38% to 76.11%. These results suggest that combining Swin-based contextual encoding, multi-scale decoder fusion, contour-derived training supervision, and probability-guided residual refinement can improve region-based mammographic mass segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.