Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645956›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2026

A Comprehensive Review of SLR Systems: Challenges, Datasets, and Unresolved Gaps.

Aigerim Yerimbetova, Ulmeken Berzhanova, Marek Milosz, Bakzhan Sakenov, Elmira Daiyrbayeva, Lyailya Cherikbayeva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aigerim YerimbetovaInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2013-1513
Ulmeken BerzhanovaInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0000-2467-5721
Marek MiloszInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-815X
Bakzhan SakenovInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9849-6176
Elmira DaiyrbayevaInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-5456
Lyailya CherikbayevaInstitute of Information and Computational Technologies of the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-4205

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan Grant No. BR24992875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of sensor technologies, automated sign language recognition (SLR) has emerged as a critical enabler of inclusive communication systems for individuals with hearing and speech impairments. Although substantial research effort has been directed toward this domain, existing reviews lack a structured comparison of sensing modalities and do not systematically address the challenges of low-resource sign languages. This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of sensor-based and multimodal SLR systems, covering 76 publications from 2021 to 2026 selected through a PRISMA 2020 protocol. We propose an original four-category taxonomy encompassing wearable sensor-based, contactless non-visual, vision-based, and multimodal systems, and provide a three-category methodological classification distinguishing conventional, machine learning, and deep learning approaches. The comparative analysis reveals that, despite notable progress, critical challenges persist: the absence of standardized datasets, limited cross-user generalization, insufficient multimodal fusion strategies, and inadequate representation of low-resource sign languages, including Kazakh Sign Language (KSL). The findings of this review establish a structured foundation for future research aimed at developing robust, scalable, and computationally efficient SLR systems.

Indexed as

methodssensorssign languagesign language recognitionsystems

Identifiers

PMID42645956
PMCPMC13514777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.