ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Frequency-Guided Expert Modulation for Noisy-Label Facial Expression Recognition.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial expression recognition in the wild is challenged by both noisy supervision and degraded visual evidence: subtle expression cues must be interpreted under blur, contrast changes, image noise, and annotator disagreement. Existing noisy-label FER methods mainly regulate samples, labels, or attention, while frequency information is rarely used to adapt the semantic representation itself. We propose Frequency-Guided Expert Modulation (FARM-FER), which treats local and global frequency descriptors as a control signal rather than an additional classifier input. A joint Haar-DWT and radial-FFT context guides soft routing among nonlinear experts and channel-wise affine recalibration of the semantic feature, while a learned gate combines the two corrections before a lightweight classifier predicts the expression from the refined representation. Across RAF-DB, FER+, and AffectNet under symmetric label noise, with additional evaluations under class-dependent label noise on RAF-DB and native crowd-label ambiguity on FER+, FARM-FER consistently improves matched baselines. At 30% symmetric noise, FARM-FER reaches 89.18% accuracy on RAF-DB, with a 1.6% performance gain over the matched Swin-Tiny baseline; the gains also hold in a controlled ResNet18 reimplementation and in class-sensitive AffectNet evaluation. Measured cost analyses show only modest parameter and FLOP overhead, supporting a lightweight yet effective design in terms of model size and arithmetic cost for noisy-label FER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.