ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Inductive Conformal Prediction for Guaranteed Class-Label Coverage in Object Detection.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conformal prediction has emerged as a principled framework for uncertainty quantification in computer vision, offering rigorous finite-sample coverage guarantees. However, its application in object detection has remained largely confined to localization, as standard inference codebases typically yield only top-1 class scores, precluding full class-label conformalization. In this work, we bridge this gap by adapting four architecturally diverse detectors-Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, YOLO11, and RT-DETRv2-to facilitate the extraction of comprehensive per-class score vectors and the estimation of background confidence in the absence of native background modeling. Leveraging these adapted architectures, we implement inductive conformal prediction (ICP) using five distinct nonconformity functions: Top-K, Adaptive Prediction Sets (APS), Hinge, Margin, and Brier score. Our framework is rigorously benchmarked across a curated 20-class subset of MS-COCO and two specialized parasite egg datasets (AI4NTD P1.5v2 and Chula-ParasiteEgg-11). In addition, a Naive cumulative-threshold method is included as a baseline for comparison with APS, given their comparable mathematical formulations. Across target coverage levels of 90%, 95%, and 99%, the conformalized models consistently achieved nominal coverage with only minor finite-sample deviations. Hinge and APS exhibited an optimal balance between statistical coverage and prediction-set efficiency, whereas Margin and Brier scores tended toward larger sets under high data complexity and strict coverage requirements. With empty prediction sets maintained below 0.1%, our findings establish ICP as a robust and adaptable paradigm for trustworthy class-label uncertainty estimation, particularly within safety-critical workflows such as automated parasite diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.