Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645939›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Performance Analysis of Discrete Wavelet Transform Bases for Multimodal Medical Image Decomposition and Fusion Quality Assessment.

Stojche Rechanoski, Jasmina Veta Buralieva, Saso Koceski, Nikolay Hinov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stojche RechanoskiFaculty of Computer Science, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov, 10A, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.
Jasmina Veta BuralievaFaculty of Computer Science, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov, 10A, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.ORCID 0009-0002-6621-9569
Saso KoceskiFaculty of Computer Science, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov, 10A, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.
Nikolay HinovCoE "National Center of Mechatronics and Clean Technologies", 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-0308-4858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fusion of information from multiple imaging modalities plays a very important role in medical diagnosis. Wavelet-based transformations have been identified as powerful methods for this purpose due to their multiresolution nature, which enables the simultaneous preservation of both structural and fine-detail information across different frequency bands. In this paper we present experimental results obtained from the wavelet-based decomposition and fusion of medical images using Python and PyWavelets. Seven wavelets from four wavelet families-Daubechies ('db1', 'db10'), biorthogonal ('bior1.3', 'bior4.4'), coiflets ('coif1', 'coif10'), and discrete Meyer ('dmey')-were systematically evaluated across three decomposition levels. An emphasis was put on the preservation of approximation and detail sub-images. Results outline that simpler wavelets used for the wavelet-based decomposition of grayscale medical images produce more details when compared with the colored medical images. From the tested fusion rules, and for the specific image pairs used in the analyses, we conclude that the average fusion rule gives the best information, without a lack of or excess of information regarding the visual quality of the fused image. Considering entropy as a quality metric and according to its higher values at all levels, the 'bior4.4' wavelet emerges as the best for wavelet-based image fusion. These findings could provide practical guidance for wavelet selection in multimodal medical image fusion pipelines.

Indexed as

medical imageswavelet-based image decomposition and fusionwavelet transform

Identifiers

PMID42645939
PMCPMC13514634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.