Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645938›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Efficient Dermoscopic Lesion Segmentation via Multi-Directional State-Space Modeling and Frequency-Aware Boundary Refinement.

Zhengqi Liu, Lijun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhengqi LiuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Lijun XuSchool of Computer Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-3786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-space models segment images in linear time, but existing dermoscopic segmenters serialize the two-dimensional feature map along only one or two scan directions and operate purely in the spatial domain, which dilutes the orientation cues and fine boundary information that distinguish a pigmented lesion from surrounding skin. We address both limitations in a single linear-complexity network, Hydra-DermSeg-Net, that unifies three components not previously combined for this task: a four-directional bidirectional Hydra block that aggregates forward and backward selective scans over horizontal, vertical and two diagonal trajectories with learnable fusion weights; a differentiable discrete cosine transform (DCT) branch that decouples high- and low-frequency content so that boundary detail is processed separately from global semantics; and a learnable local contrast-enhancement front-end coupled with a clDice-supervised boundary attention gate. On a merged ISIC 2017/2018 corpus of 3994 images, the model attains a Dice coefficient of 0.9041 and an Intersection-over-Union (IoU) of 0.8386 against five baselines (U-Net, Att-UNet, VM-UNet, TransUNet and MALUNet) trained from scratch under a unified protocol, and it transfers to an unseen HAM10000 subset at 0.9347 Dice. It attains the highest Dice and IoU on each of the three data partitions examined, the highest Sensitivity, and the lowest 95-percentile Hausdorff distance under every random seed; the margin over the strongest convolutional baselines is about 0.002 in Dice and lies within the variation between training runs. An ablation at the full model capacity isolates the contribution of each component: removing the frequency branch costs 0.86 points of Dice and 0.99 points of Boundary IoU, and removing the boundary attention gate 0.66 and 2.85 points respectively. These results show that combining multi-directional state-space scanning with frequency-domain decoupling yields accurate and parameter-efficient segmentation without the quadratic cost of self-attention.

Indexed as

boundary attentiondermoscopyfrequency-domain decouplinglinear-complexity segmentationmulti-directional scanningskin lesion segmentationstate-space model

Identifiers

PMID42645938
PMCPMC13514818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.