Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645890›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026

From Anatomical Staging to Precision Prognostication: Evolution of Gallbladder Cancer Staging Across AJCC Editions and the 2025 UICC TNM Update.

Tianyi Shen, Nicholas Kai Yi Tan, Wen Xuan Chew, Matthias Yi Quan Liau, Vor Luvira, Vinay K Kapoor, Orestis Ioannidis, Vishal G Shelat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianyi ShenLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
Nicholas Kai Yi TanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0008-7307-7371
Wen Xuan ChewLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
Matthias Yi Quan LiauLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0007-0623-2477
Vor LuviraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Vinay K KapoorDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital (MGMCH), Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology (MGUMST), Jaipur 302 022, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6953-7947
Orestis Ioannidis4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0861-8783
Vishal G ShelatLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3988-8142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy and is among the most lethal gastrointestinal cancers. Since its inclusion in cancer staging manuals, the GBC Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification has undergone repeated revisions intended to improve anatomical precision and prognostic discrimination. This narrative review traces the evolution of GBC staging across AJCC editions and the 2025 UICC TNM update and critically examines whether these refinements have translated into clinically meaningful risk stratification. In the 2025 UICC TNM 9 grouping, Stage IA corresponds to T1aN0M0 and Stage IB to T1bN0M0, while T2aN0M0 and T2bN0M0 remain Stage IIA and IIB, respectively. Structured literature searches were performed to identify historical staging documents, population-based analyses, validation studies, and prognostic reports relevant to stage migration, survival discrimination, and emerging staging modifiers. Successive changes, including T-category refinement and the transition from nodal location to nodal burden, have improved anatomical resolution. However, available validation studies suggest that gains in overall prognostic performance remain modest, with reported concordance indices often remaining near 0.66. Contemporary evidence increasingly shows that tumour location, adequacy of lymphadenectomy, number of positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes, obstructive jaundice, residual disease status, and selected molecular alterations may capture inter-patient heterogeneity beyond anatomy alone. Future staging refinement should therefore preserve TNM as a common anatomical language while developing validated parallel modifiers that support more individualized prognostication and treatment selection.

Indexed as

AJCCgallbladder cancermolecular markerspersonalized managementprognosticationTNM staging

Identifiers

PMID42645890
PMCPMC13514314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.