ArticleJournal of eye movement research2026
Visual Attention and Strategic Sophistication in the Strategic Environment Effect: An Eye-Tracking Approach.
Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates how strategic environments shape a decision maker's reasoning processes by incorporating visual attention and cognitive engagement. Using eye-tracking methods within experimental guessing games featuring interior equilibria, we analyze how strategic complementarity and substitutability alter choice behavior and cognitive engagement. We find that while choices diverge further from equilibrium under strategic complementarity, eye gaze metrics-specifically fixation and transition measures-are consistent with more intensive cognitive engagement under strategic substitutability. Furthermore, by using a novel approach to measure strategic sophistication, we find that individuals with higher strategic aptitude exhibit higher levels of visual engagement with the payoff table. As strategic sophistication increases, the two distinct dimensions of attention build up sequentially rather than together, with attention to an individual's own strategies strengthening prior to attention to their opponents'. These findings indicate that visual attention is shaped systematically by the strategic environment and are consistent with a sequential organization of reasoning that may underlie the strategic environment effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.