ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
On-Table Versus Deferred Extubation After Paediatric Cardiac Catheterisation Under General Anaesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExtubation timing after paediatric cardiac catheterisation under general anaesthesia remains a challenging clinical decision, particularly in children with cyanotic or haemodynamically significant congenital heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with non-on-table extubation and to assess early postoperative respiratory outcomes in this high-risk population.
designThis was a single-centre retrospective cohort study conducted in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory.
methodsPaediatric patients with cyanotic or haemodynamically significant/complex congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterisation under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they were extubated on-table in the catheterisation laboratory or transferred to the intensive care unit with ongoing invasive mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was non-on-table extubation. Secondary outcomes included extubation timing, reintubation within 48 h, major respiratory complications within 48 h, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and 7-day and 30-day mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-on-table extubation.
findingsSeventy-two patients were included. On-table extubation was performed in 52 patients (72.2%), whereas 20 patients (27.8%) were not extubated on-table. Patients not extubated on-table were younger, had lower body weight, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV (ASA IV) frequency, higher Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics (CRISP) scores, lower baseline SpO
conclusionsOn-table extubation after paediatric cardiac catheterisation under general anaesthesia was feasible in most selected patients with cyanotic or haemodynamically significant/complex congenital heart disease. Higher CRISP score and emergency procedures were independently associated with non-on-table extubation. These findings suggest that catheterisation-specific risk assessment may help anticipate postoperative ventilatory requirements in high-risk paediatric cardiac catheterisation patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.