ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment After Lesion Preparation in Selected Acute Coronary Syndrome Lesions: A Dual-Center Real-World Registry.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-coated balloon (DCB) PCI can avoid permanent metallic scaffolding in selected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) lesions, but interpretation depends on lesion preparation, procedural selection, and follow-up ascertainment. We analyzed a retrospective dual-center registry of 276 unique patients who underwent one index DCB-treated ACS procedure after operator-judged adequate lesion preparation. Presentations were NSTEMI in 174 patients (63.0%), STEMI in 90 (32.6%), and unstable angina in 12 (4.3%). Paclitaxel-coated DCBs were used in 262 patients (94.9%) and sirolimus/non-paclitaxel DCBs in 14 (5.1%). Thrombus aspiration and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used selectively in 17 (6.2%) and 28 (10.1%) patients, respectively. Bail-out stenting was required in 13 patients (4.7%). Predominantly benign/non-flow-limiting angiographic dissection was recorded in 18 patients (6.5%). A follow-up of at least 365 days or death within 365 days was available for 274 patients (99.3%). Clinically driven TLR occurred in 18 patients (crude 18/274, 6.6%; Kaplan-Meier 365-day estimate, 6.8%; 95% CI, 4.3-10.5), all occurring between 3 and 9 months. All-cause death occurred in 12 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.5-7.5). In selected ACS lesions that passed a preparation gate, DCB treatment was associated with feasible procedural results and acceptable 12-month clinically recorded outcomes. The findings do not estimate all-comer DCB eligibility and should not be interpreted in terms of the efficacy of DCBs compared with DESs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.