Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645835›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026

Neuroprognostication After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: ECMO-Specific Challenges and a Multimodal Time-Sensitive Framework.

Debora Emanuela Torre, Carmelo Pirri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Debora Emanuela TorreDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Mestre, 30174 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-5046-4275
Carmelo PirriDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, 35121 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-6549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged as a promising strategy for selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest, improving survival and the likelihood of favorable neurological outcomes. However, neurological prognostication in this setting remains highly challenging and insufficiently standardized. The pathophysiological complexity of ECPR, including global ischemia-reperfusion injury, altered cerebral perfusion, systemic inflammation, anticoagulation and prolonged sedation, limits the reliability of conventional post-cardiac arrest prognostic tools. This narrative review provides a focused and clinically oriented synthesis of current evidence on brain injury and neuroprognostication in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for cardiac arrest. Key determinants of neurological outcome across pre-ECMO and peri-resuscitation phases are examined, alongside the role and limitations of multimodal monitoring strategies, including neurological examination, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, cerebral oximetry and circulating biomarkers. Particular attention is given to the timing of prognostication and the risk of premature or inaccurate predictions leading to self-fulfilling prophecies. Emerging data suggest that neurological recovery in ECPR patients may be delayed, supporting a more cautious and time-adapted approach. A pragmatic, multimodal framework for neurological assessment in this population is outlined. By addressing current gaps and proposing a structured approach, this review aims to inform clinical decision making and contribute to improved neurologically meaningful survival in ECPR-treated cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationneurological outcomeneuroprognosticationpost-cardiac arrest care

Identifiers

PMID42645835
PMCPMC13513520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.