ArticleSports medicine - open2026
Machine Learning Model Development and Evaluation for Non-contact Lower Limb Injury Risk Prediction in Elite Male Rugby Union: A Multi-team, Multi-season Analysis.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence, incidence rate and burden of injuries are high in rugby union. Despite the growing application of machine learning for injury risk analysis in sport, its use in rugby union has been primarily confined to single-team and single-season study cohorts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of machine learning-based injury risk prediction models in elite male rugby union and to interpret their potential applicability in professional sporting environments.
methodsMulti-season data (2021/22-2023/24) relating to 129 professional male rugby union players from the four Irish provincial teams (Connacht Rugby, Leinster Rugby, Munster Rugby and Ulster Rugby), along with the Ireland men's national team, were included in the analyses. External workload data from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) units, self-perceived wellness scores, and musculoskeletal screening measures were modelled using logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost). 'Injury' was defined as a non-contact, soft-tissue injury to the lower limb, with incidents logged by team medical staff in a centralised athlete management system.
resultsCatBoost achieved the highest values of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC = 0.66), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC = 0.008, prevalence = 0.0039), and precision (0.013).
conclusionPredictive performance across the models was poor, with low precision scores highlighting each model's inability to effectively identify impending injuries. The resulting high false-positive rate (1 correct prediction for every 77 false predictions) underscores the limited applicability of the tested machine learning approaches within the modelling framework analysed in this study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.