Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645767›Full record

ArticleSports medicine - open2026

Machine Learning Model Development and Evaluation for Non-contact Lower Limb Injury Risk Prediction in Elite Male Rugby Union: A Multi-team, Multi-season Analysis.

Chris Leckey, Nicol van Dyk, Jakim Berndsen, Cailbhe Doherty, Aonghus Lawlor, Eamonn Delahunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris LeckeySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. christopher.leckey@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-3252
Nicol van DykSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5997
Jakim BerndsenSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3875-3853
Cailbhe DohertySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-856X
Aonghus LawlorInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-4639
Eamonn DelahuntSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-5932

Funding

Irish Research Council EBPPG/2022/228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence, incidence rate and burden of injuries are high in rugby union. Despite the growing application of machine learning for injury risk analysis in sport, its use in rugby union has been primarily confined to single-team and single-season study cohorts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of machine learning-based injury risk prediction models in elite male rugby union and to interpret their potential applicability in professional sporting environments.

methodsMulti-season data (2021/22-2023/24) relating to 129 professional male rugby union players from the four Irish provincial teams (Connacht Rugby, Leinster Rugby, Munster Rugby and Ulster Rugby), along with the Ireland men's national team, were included in the analyses. External workload data from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) units, self-perceived wellness scores, and musculoskeletal screening measures were modelled using logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost). 'Injury' was defined as a non-contact, soft-tissue injury to the lower limb, with incidents logged by team medical staff in a centralised athlete management system.

resultsCatBoost achieved the highest values of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC = 0.66), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC = 0.008, prevalence = 0.0039), and precision (0.013).

conclusionPredictive performance across the models was poor, with low precision scores highlighting each model's inability to effectively identify impending injuries. The resulting high false-positive rate (1 correct prediction for every 77 false predictions) underscores the limited applicability of the tested machine learning approaches within the modelling framework analysed in this study.

Identifiers

PMID42645767
PMCPMC13518749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.