ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Single-port robotic colorectal resection: outcomes in 138 consecutive patients.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-port robotic (SPr) colorectal surgery represents an emerging minimally invasive technique with limited data regarding its safety and outcomes. This study of a large series of SPr abdominal colorectal resections, focuses on feasibility, safety, and early perioperative outcomes. From an IRB approved, prospectively maintained database, we identified all elective SPr colorectal resections with abdominal approaches performed between 10/2018 and 3/2026. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, procedures, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. We identified 138 consecutive patients. Mean age was 59 years (range 21-87) and BMI was 26.7 kg/m² (15.3-42.6). Females accounted for 62% of the study population. 45.7% had prior abdominal surgery. Resections included right-sided (32.6%), left-sided (37%), pelvic (28.3%) and total abdominal colectomy (2.2%). Intraoperative complications rate was 1.5%, with no conversions to open. Diverting stomas were created in 14.5% of cases. Pathology included diverticular disease (38.4%), malignancy (37%), inflammatory bowel disease (9.4%), and other benign conditions (15.2%). The 30-day morbidity was 15.2%, with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications occurring in 5.1%. There were no 30-day mortalities. This series demonstrates that SPr colorectal resection via abdominal approach is a feasible and safe technique across a broad spectrum of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. It represents one of the largest reported experiences of SPr colorectal abdominal resections to date, reporting favorable perioperative patient outcomes and acceptable morbidity. Future SPr enhancements, including dedicated stapling, vessel-sealing, and suction instruments, will lead to broader platform adoption and may further optimize patient safety and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.