Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645736›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026

Leveraging ECG foundation models in critical care for sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation classification.

Maria Galanty, Michiel Hulleman, Merijn C Reuland, Björn van der Ster, Alexander P J Vlaar, Clara I Sánchez, AF Expert Panel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria GalantyInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.galanty@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2574-1775
Michiel HullemanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Merijn C ReulandDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Björn van der SterDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Clara I SánchezInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
AF Expert Panel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in deep learning have led to the development of ECG foundation models (ECG-FMs) trained with self-supervised learning, which can extract generalizable representations from large-scale data. In this study, we evaluated the performance of these ECG-FMs in detecting atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm during continuous monitoring of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, using data from Amsterdam University Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC). Our three-stage study: (i) used within-dataset classification performance on public PhysioNet datasets as an indirect proxy for label consistency, (ii) tested off-the-shelf fine-tuned ECG-FMs on ICU data, and (iii) fine-tuned ECG-FM on curated public datasets, with and without weakly labelled in-house ICU data.

resultsOff-the-shelf model showed limited transferability (F1 = 0.68 for sinus rhythm (SR), 0.52 for atrial fibrillation (AF)). Fine-tuning on consistent public datasets achieved robust performance (F1 = 0.91 for SR, 0.82 for AF), while adding weakly labelled ICU data further improved recall at some cost to precision. Performance remained stable across varying ECG lead configurations, supporting adaptability to heterogeneous inputs.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that off-the-shelf pre-trained ECG-FMs do not generalise well to continuous monitoring in ICU populations; however, after targeted fine-tuning, they can achieve strong performance even in unseen cohorts, underscoring the importance of high-quality fine-tuning data and rigorous local validation.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationContinuous monitoringDeep learningECGICU

Identifiers

PMID42645736
PMCPMC13518658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.