ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Leveraging ECG foundation models in critical care for sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation classification.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in deep learning have led to the development of ECG foundation models (ECG-FMs) trained with self-supervised learning, which can extract generalizable representations from large-scale data. In this study, we evaluated the performance of these ECG-FMs in detecting atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm during continuous monitoring of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, using data from Amsterdam University Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC). Our three-stage study: (i) used within-dataset classification performance on public PhysioNet datasets as an indirect proxy for label consistency, (ii) tested off-the-shelf fine-tuned ECG-FMs on ICU data, and (iii) fine-tuned ECG-FM on curated public datasets, with and without weakly labelled in-house ICU data.
resultsOff-the-shelf model showed limited transferability (F1 = 0.68 for sinus rhythm (SR), 0.52 for atrial fibrillation (AF)). Fine-tuning on consistent public datasets achieved robust performance (F1 = 0.91 for SR, 0.82 for AF), while adding weakly labelled ICU data further improved recall at some cost to precision. Performance remained stable across varying ECG lead configurations, supporting adaptability to heterogeneous inputs.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that off-the-shelf pre-trained ECG-FMs do not generalise well to continuous monitoring in ICU populations; however, after targeted fine-tuning, they can achieve strong performance even in unseen cohorts, underscoring the importance of high-quality fine-tuning data and rigorous local validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.