Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645735›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

HOPFIT: A neuro-cardiovascular monitoring framework for precision sedation, anaesthesia, and resuscitation.

Andrea Lavinio, Stefano Romagnoli, Basil Matta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea LavinioPerioperative, Acute, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (PACE) Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. andrea.lavinio1@nhs.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8832-918X
Stefano RomagnoliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Basil MattaPerioperative, Acute, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (PACE) Section, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of advanced monitoring technologies in anaesthesia and critical care has enabled continuous assessment of neurological, haemodynamic, and oxygen delivery parameters. Despite this, integrating multiple data streams into coherent, physiology-guided clinical decisions remains challenging, and unified interpretive frameworks remain limited. To introduce the HOPFIT framework - a conceptual model linking continuous neuro-cardiovascular monitoring to structured, physiology-guided clinical reasoning across six interdependent domains. HOPFIT organises six therapeutic domains - Hypnotics, Opioids, Pressors, Fluids, Inotropes, and Transfusion - around the interdependence of brain function, cardiovascular physiology, and oxygen delivery. Rather than introducing new monitoring modalities, the framework provides a unifying structure for bedside interpretation of existing data, including processed electroencephalography, cerebral oximetry, dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness, non-invasive haemoglobin, and cardiac output monitoring. An original pharmacodynamic risk surface illustrates the interaction between hypnotic and analgesic agents, and a conceptual hypotension framework integrating EEG and haemodynamic data illustrates how multimodal information may support clinical reasoning. Tables summarise monitoring parameters, commonly used ranges, and potential clinical applications across patient groups. HOPFIT is intended as a conceptual and educational tool to support integration of multimodal physiological data at the bedside, rather than a prescriptive clinical protocol. Prospective studies are required to determine its impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Fluid responsivenessHOPFIT frameworkNeuro-cardiovascular monitoringPersonalised anaesthesiaPrecision sedationProcessed EEGTransfusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.