Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645691›Full record

ReviewArchives of osteoporosis2026

Nails in osteoporosis and bone metabolism: a narrative review of current evidence and future directions.

Jiani Fan, Jiabao Cai, Shengguang Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiani FanSchool of Gongli Hospital Medical Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Jiabao CaiSchool of Gongli Hospital Medical Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China.
Shengguang ChenSchool of Gongli Hospital Medical Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, China. csg0720@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3303-4599

Funding

Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission No. PW2024A-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis is a widespread public health problem, yet Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)-the current diagnostic gold standard-has significant limitations, including high cost, radiation exposure, and inability to assess bone organic phase changes. As an easily accessible epidermal derivative, nails share high molecular homology with bone tissue and offer unique advantages of non-invasive collection and stable composition reflecting medium- to long-term metabolic status. This narrative review aimed to systematically collate the pathophysiological associations between nails and bone metabolism and comprehensively analyze the clinical application evidence of nails in osteoporosis diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognostic assessment.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Elsevier databases from inception to 2026. The search strategy combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords: (nail OR fingernail OR toenail OR keratin) AND (osteoporosis OR bone metabolism OR bone mineral density OR fracture risk OR bone quality). Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed original studies, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses; (2) studies exploring relationships between nail characteristics (composition, structure, or morphology) and bone health; and (3) human studies or animal model studies with direct clinical implications. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Ultimately, 32 studies were included.

resultsNails and bones share profound homology in structural protein metabolism (cysteine-disulfide bond pathways), mineral deposition (calcium and magnesium), and hormone regulation (estrogen and thyroid hormones). Clinically, nail plate thickness reduction and keratin structural abnormalities have been observed in osteoporosis patients. In grassroots screening, Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) achieved a classification accuracy of 85.9% atone-tenth the cost of DXA. For supplementary bone quality diagnosis, Raman spectroscopy combined with clinical data evaluating keratin disulfide bonds achieved an AUC of 74%, effectively identifying 75% of fracture patients missed by DXA. In treatment monitoring, nail composition changes preceded DXA-detected bone mineral density alterations, providing molecular evidence for early efficacy evaluation. For prognostic assessment, nail-related indicators predicted fracture risk over 3-20 years (OR 2.2 alone; OR 3.8 combined with clinical risk factors). The REMS fragility score also independently predicted fracture risk (OR = 9.23 when FS 37.2). A tiered integration model combining clinical risk assessment with nail-based screening was proposed to optimize clinical workflow.

conclusionNails demonstrate clear clinical value as a non-invasive tool for primary osteoporosis screening, supplementary bone quality assessment, treatment response monitoring, and fracture risk prediction. Future research should focus on technical standardization, large-sample prospective validation, and in-depth mechanistic studies to further unlock their potential. Integrated with clinical evaluation and DXA, nail analysis is expected to become an important auxiliary tool in the global osteoporosis prevention and control system.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesNailsOsteoporosisAnimalsBone DensityHumansBone metabolismBone qualityDiagnosisFracture riskNail biomarkersOsteoporosisPrognostic assessmentTreatment monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.