ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Minimally invasive suture training for resident, a pilot project: the MAESTRO project.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the dominance of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), traditional "see one, do one, teach one" residency models often lack structured ex-vivo training. Competency Assessment Tools (CAT) are essential for objective performance evaluation in this field. To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, 6-h intensive training protocol using the "Simsei laparoscopic trainer" in improving residents' skills in intracorporeal knot tying and continuous suturing. This prospective, observer-blinded study involved six surgical residents (PGY 1-5). Participants underwent a baseline test (intracorporeal knot and continuous suture), followed by 6 h of interval training over two months, and a final post-training test. Performances were recorded and evaluated by blinded raters using the validated Laparoscopic Suturing Competency Assessment Tool (LS-CAT). Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests. Baseline surveys revealed that while 83.3% of residents had used simulators, only 50% had them integrated into their formal curriculum. Post-training results showed significant improvements in overall LS-CAT scores, including instrument handling, tissue handling, and total error reduction. Specifically, significant progress was noted in almost all domains, except for needle passage and the first double throw (p=0.05 for both). A brief, structured ex-vivo curriculum significantly enhances laparoscopic suturing proficiency. These findings suggest that such programs should be integrated into core surgical residency curricula from the earliest stages of training. Further studies with larger cohorts and control groups are necessary to assess the transferability of these skills to the operating room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.