ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2026
Hierarchical two-stage ensemble of dilated U-net models for brain tumor segmentation.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensemble methods for image segmentation improve performance by combining predictions from multiple models, yielding more accurate and reliable results. This study presents a two-stage hierarchical framework to enhance the accuracy and stability of brain tumor delineation in magnetic resonance imaging data. The proposed approach integrates ensemble strategies at different stages of the processing pipeline. The architecture operates in two stages: first, sub-ensembles resolve internal inconsistencies through simple averaging; second, their outputs are fused into a final prediction using union-based aggregation. The method was evaluated on the Figshare brain tumor dataset and demonstrated progressive performance improvements from individual models to the final hierarchical ensemble. The proposed approach achieved a Dice coefficient of 94.50% and an intersection over union of 89.91%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. The statistical significance of these improvements was confirmed using one-way analysis of variance across three experimental groups, followed by post hoc pairwise testing. The proposed architecture preserves high fidelity in delineating diffuse tumor boundaries and complex morphological structures. By decomposing the ensemble process into two stages, the framework effectively reduces stochastic errors typical of single-model predictions, resulting in a more robust and stable segmentation system that performs reliably even in cases with low contrast and complex tissue interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.