Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645651›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2026

Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Antimicrobial Drugs Throughout Pregnancy. Part II: Cephalosporins.

Femke A Elzinga, Kaylee R M Ferrier, Fabian Mulder, Eline H van der Veen, Jelmer R Prins, Lars C Nijdam, Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge, Rik L J Winter, Jos G W Kosterink, Daan J Touw and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Femke A Elzinga *Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kaylee R M Ferrier *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Fabian MulderDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eline H van der VeenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelmer R PrinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lars C NijdamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn N Lub-de HoogeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rik L J WinterDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jos G W KosterinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daan J TouwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paola MianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.mian@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-1201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesUnderstanding the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics in pregnant women is essential for safe and effective treatment. This review is part of a series that evaluates the PK, exposure, and target attainment of antibiotics during pregnancy. Part II focuses on cephalosporins and investigates if evidence-based dosing regimens are developed.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed on 24 July 2025. Articles containing PK data on pregnant women treated with any of the 35 selected cephalosporins were classified as relevant. Extracted PK and target attainment parameters included volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (CL), drug concentrations, area under the curve, elimination half-life (t

resultsOf 219 articles identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria, covering 14 out of 35 cephalosporins. During second (T2) and third (T3) trimesters of pregnancy, Vd (9.2-18.4%) and CL (30.8-100%) were higher compared with nonpregnant, first trimester, or postpartum women. Consequently, reduced target attainment was reported in T2 and T3 pregnant women. Evidence-based dosing regimens were proposed for pregnant women receiving cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cephradine, cefatrizine, and ceftizoxime.

conclusionsDuring pregnancy, an increase in Vd and CL was observed, indicating a potential need for higher or additional dosages, or shorter dosing intervals to achieve target attainment. However, evidence-based dosing adjustments were identified for only seven cephalosporins. These findings highlight significant gaps in knowledge and underscore the need for further research to characterize PK profiles and establish dosing recommendations for the remaining cephalosporins in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsPregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleFirst Generation CephalosporinsHalf-LifeHumansPregnancySecond Generation CephalosporinsThird Generation CephalosporinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsFirst Generation CephalosporinsSecond Generation CephalosporinsThird Generation Cephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID42645651
PMCPMC13624020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.