Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645634›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2026

Occupational Physical Activity and Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

Tyler D Quinn, Mikenna Love, Vikrant Jagadeesan, William R Boyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tyler D QuinnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. tyler.quinn1@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0172-062X
Mikenna LoveDepartment of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6494-0726
Vikrant JagadeesanCoronary and Structural Interventions, Heart and Vascular Institute, WVU Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3596-5104
William R BoyerDepartment of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9743-6086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize the prospective and experimental evidence examining occupational physical activity (OPA) and hypertension-related outcomes, discuss potential physiological mechanisms, and identify methodological challenges contributing to heterogeneity across studies. RECENT

findingsProspective evidence linking OPA with hypertension and resting blood pressure remains limited and inconsistent, with studies reporting predominantly null or modestly inverse associations. Some evidence suggests very high OPA may be unfavorable in specific subgroups, particularly when combined with low recovery or high cardiovascular strain. Experimental and ambulatory monitoring studies indicate that some forms of OPA may produce higher ambulatory cardiovascular load, and impaired autonomic recovery despite limited impacts on resting clinic blood pressure. In contrast, leisure-time physical activity consistently demonstrates antihypertensive benefits. OPA and leisure-time physical activity may not have equivalent cardiovascular impacts. Future research should prioritize improved exposure assessment, ambulatory cardiovascular monitoring, and mechanistic study designs.

Indexed as

Blood PressureExerciseHypertensionOccupational HealthBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansLeisure ActivitiesAmbulatory blood pressureCardiovascular riskLeisure-time physical activityPhysical activity health paradoxWorkplace health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.