ArticleMycorrhiza2026
A space-for-time assessment of drought vulnerability for ectomycorrhizal fungi of seasonally dry, old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii ecosystems.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forests of British Columbia are typically exposed to summer droughts, which are likely to increase in magnitude with climate warming. We examined the ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) of seasonally dry coastal and interior P. menziesii old-growth stands on contrasting (mesic vs. dry) soils to better understand their vulnerability to a reduction in soil water-holding capacity (as a proxy for rising climatic moisture deficits [CMD]). Coastal stands (CMD = 330) had considerably higher EMF species richness than interior stands (95 vs. 53 spp., on average), which was mirrored by a similar disparity in sporocarp fruiting. Interior forests (CMD = 402) were further differentiated from coastal stands by a greater proportion of ascomycete species and long-distance rather than contact mantle exploration types. We also found that pioneer fungi (Wilcoxina, Rhizopogon and Suillus) dominated interior stands (68% of read depth, on average), an unusual attribute for old-growth forests. Only the coastal stands demonstrated a clear decline in EMF species richness on dry vs. mesic soils, along with a weakly significant disparity in community composition. Increasing CMD as projected for the coast could result in species loss, based on this space-for-time substitution, although the sizeable EMF community of dry soils ([Formula: see text] 80 spp. per plot) may provide adequate functional resilience under climate change, at least in the near term. The smaller, more stable cohort of EMF species (dominated by pioneer fungi) found in the interior may represent the ultimate trajectory of EMF communities with P. menziesii under continuous warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.