ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Evaluation of MPEG-4 AAC Audio Codec Using EEG and EMG Signals for Use with DICOM® Neurophysiology.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern neurophysiological recording technologies are producing large volumes of data. This study investigates the use of the Moving Picture Experts Group version 4 Advanced Audio Coding (MPEG-4 AAC) for compressing electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) signals. All EEG signals contained either seizures or interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), which are nonstationary patterns characterized by sharp transients. Differences between pairs of original single-channel signals and compressed/decompressed signals were explored using the Percentage Root Mean Square Difference (PRD), power spectral density (PSD) features, and clinical expert opinion of waveform morphology. PRD was used as the primary error measure and PSD features were explored across different frequency bands. The results showed substantial decline in signal quality based on human expert opinion for compressed then reconstructed EEG signals with PRD error greater than 15% and EMG signals with PRD greater than 1%. PSD analysis showed significant changes in the gamma and beta bands for both EEG and EMG signals. This study provides further evidence that standard audio codecs which use psychoacoustic models, such as MPEG-4 AAC, do not sufficiently support compression of neurophysiology waveforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.