Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645581›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

Minimal kyphotic progression following pediatric vertebral fractures: implications for reduced radiographic surveillance.

Sebastian Wegmann, Maximilian Lenz, Tamara Babasiz, Peer Eysel, Lars Peter Mueller, Maximilian Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastian WegmannDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. sebastian.wegmann@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7617-8740
Maximilian LenzDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-0166
Tamara BabasizDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2514-7611
Peer EyselDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lars Peter MuellerDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maximilian WeberDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-5286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPediatric spinal fractures are rare injuries (14.24 per 100,000 per year), representing only 0.6-3% of all spinal injuries. While most stable compression fractures are managed conservatively, concerns exist regarding progressive vertebral collapse and kyphotic deformity. Unlike extensive adult literature, pediatric-specific data on radiographic progression following conservative management remain limited, creating uncertainty about the clinical utility of routine follow-up imaging in this radiosensitive population. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective single-centre cohort study of 54 pediatric patients (mean age 12.3 years) with traumatic vertebral body fractures diagnosed between 2012 and 2024. Kyphosis angles were measured using Cobb methodology at baseline and follow-up intervals (1, 3, and 6 weeks). The primary outcome was the change in kyphotic angle; secondary outcomes included the identification of predictors of progression. Paired t-tests and multivariable linear regression analysis were performed.

resultsKyphosis angles remained essentially unchanged across all follow-up intervals (ΔFU1 + 0.19°, ΔFU2 + 1.27°, ΔFU3 - 0.14°), with no statistically significant differences detected (p > 0.05 at all timepoints). No clinical or radiographic factors predicted progression of kyphosis. Only three patients (5.6%) required treatment escalation. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences across fracture types, treatment modality, or injury characteristics.

conclusionPediatric patients with stable compression fractures demonstrate minimal kyphotic progression regardless of treatment approach. Routine radiographic surveillance provides little clinical value and exposes children to unnecessary ionising radiation. The present study suggests that routine radiographic follow-up may not be necessary in carefully selected patients with stable vertebral compression fractures who remain clinically asymptomatic. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and the limited sample size. Confirmation in larger prospective studies is needed before changes to routine follow-up protocols can be recommended.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionKyphosisSpinal FracturesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolConservative TreatmentDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleRadiographyRetrospective StudiesChildren largeFracture detectionRadiographSpine trauma

Identifiers

PMID42645581
PMCPMC13518497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.