Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645558›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

State-of-the-art review: ß-blockade in critical illness.

Marlies Ostermann, Daniel De Backer, Emilie Belley-Cote, Maurizio Cecconi, Michelle S Chew, Joanna C Dionne, Steven M Hollenberg, Stephan M Jakob, Salmaan Kanji, Richard Leach and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marlies OstermannDepartment of Intensive Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. m.ostermann@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-9080
Daniel De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Emilie Belley-CoteDivisions of Cardiology and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care, IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Michelle S ChewPerioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Division of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, CLINTEC, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-4111
Joanna C DionneDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Steven M HollenbergDepartment of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1293-8496
Stephan M JakobUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-0473
Salmaan KanjiThe Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0594-0360
Richard LeachDepartment of Intensive Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark J McPhailLiver Intensive Therapy Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-2424
Xavier MonnetAP‑HP, Service de Médecine Intensive‑Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin‑Bicêtre, France.
Andrea MorelliDepartment of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mervyn SingerBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-6350
Erika WilkmanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-7523
Giuseppe CiterioNeuroIntensive Care Unit, Department Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical illness is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system which plays an important adaptive role in maintaining cardiovascular stability and organ perfusion. However, excessive sustained adrenergic stimulation may become maladaptive, contributing to tachyarrhythmias, myocardial injury, immune dysregulation, metabolic derangements, and organ dysfunction. This state-of-the-art review evaluates the role of ß-blocker therapy as a potential strategy to modulate or counteract the adrenergic response in critically ill patients. Current data suggest that their use remains highly context-dependent and controversial. There are established benefits in selected scenarios, including acute myocardial infarction, tachyarrhythmias, hypertensive emergencies, thyroid storm, and prevention of variceal bleeds. In contrast, evidence is limited or conflicting in septic shock, traumatic brain injury, acute heart failure, burns and other critical care syndromes. Concerns include impairment of compensatory cardiovascular responses, reduction of cardiac output, hypotension, and compromised organ perfusion. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of ß-blockade appear to depend on the type and dose of ß-blocker, patient phenotype, timing of initiation, hemodynamic reserve, and whether therapy represents continuation of chronic treatment, withdrawal and re-initiation, or de novo initiation during acute illness. This review highlights major gaps in knowledge, including the absence of reliable indicators to identify patients most likely to benefit, uncertainty regarding optimal treatment targets and monitoring strategies, and limited randomised evidence in heterogeneous ICU populations. A phenotype-driven, physiology-guided approach that accounts for hemodynamic status, sympathetic spectrum and timing of ß-blocker therapy is likely required to optimise outcomes.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCritical IllnessHeart FailureHumansHypertensive CrisisMyocardial InfarctionShock, SepticTachycardiaThyroid CrisisAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdrenergic stimulationAdrenergic toxicityBeta-blockadeBeta-blockerCritical illness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.