SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Perfusion imaging-guided risk stratification and endovascular decision-making in low-NIHSS large-vessel occlusion stroke: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) may present with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, creating uncertainty regarding the need for endovascular therapy. Perfusion imaging may help identify patients at high risk for early neurological deterioration (END), but its clinical utility in this population remains unclear.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of studies evaluating perfusion or hemodynamic imaging in adults with low-NIHSS LVO stroke. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2026. Eligible studies reported associations between perfusion imaging markers and END or functional outcome, or evaluated imaging-informed endovascular decision-making. Random-effects models were used for exploratory pooled analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using QUIPS and ROBINS-I-informed domains, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.
resultsThe search identified 1698 records, of which 1372 remained after removal of duplicates. The evidence base included perfusion risk-stratification studies, endovascular decision-making studies, background reviews and meta-analyses, and ongoing trial protocols. Larger Tmax-defined hypoperfusion volumes, larger perfusion lesion volumes, and impaired hemodynamic reserve were associated with early neurological deterioration or poor functional outcome. In three studies eligible for exploratory pooling, a high-risk perfusion phenotype was associated with early neurological deterioration or deterioration of ischemic origin (pooled odds ratio, 6.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-25.99; I
conclusionsIn low-NIHSS LVO stroke, perfusion and hemodynamic imaging identifies a high-risk tissue-at-risk phenotype associated with neurological deterioration and poor outcome. However, evidence supporting perfusion-guided endovascular therapy remains uncertain. Randomized trials are required to define whether imaging-based selection improves outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.