ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Knowledge and Risk Perception Regarding Skin Cancer in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosuppressed patients have a substantially increased risk for developing skin cancer. Therefore, it is mandatory that such patients are adequately informed and aware of skin cancer and their increased risk to modify their behavior. Numerous studies have evaluated the topic, but no synthesis of their findings exists. The protocol of this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024618851) and its reporting followed the PRISMA-2020 guideline. To identify all studies assessing knowledge or perception of skin cancer in immunosuppressed patients, forward and backward citation tracking was employed in addition to an electronic literature search across five databases. For the risk of bias (ROB) assessment, the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies was used. Quantitatively comparable outcomes were meta-analyzed, while all others were qualitatively synthesized. Thirty-two reports comprising 4214 patients were included. Acknowledging substantial heterogeneity between studies, just over two thirds of patients recalled having been informed about their increased skin cancer risk (pooled proportion: 68.34%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 55.48-78.90). Awareness of the increased risk for skin cancer varied widely (34.5-100%), and pooled mean Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge scores were 14.77 (CI = 8.57-20.96). About half of those patients asked about risk factors for skin cancer knew that immunosuppression was among them. This indicates that immunosuppressed patients are insufficiently educated about their increased skin cancer risk. However, the high heterogeneity in the synthesized outcomes and the minimal proportion (3%) of low ROB ratings for the included studies call for further research to better understand the awareness of skin cancer risk in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.