Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645411›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026

The Illusion of Disapproval: Pluralistic Ignorance and Attitudes Toward Tattooed Teachers.

Dániel Kormos, Attila Lengyel, Anetta Müller, Éva Bácsné Bába, Antonia Kinczel, Melinda Bíró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dániel KormosInstitute of Sport Science Coordination, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0005-6986-5509
Attila LengyelCoordination and Research Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-6188
Anetta MüllerInstitute of Sports Economics and Management, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-8050
Éva Bácsné BábaInstitute of Sports Economics and Management, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0733-6637
Antonia KinczelInstitute of Sports Economics and Management, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-8047
Melinda BíróInstitute of Sport Science Coordination, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-2451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTattooed teachers are increasingly visible in schools, yet the norms governing their professional acceptability remain poorly understood. This study tests whether pluralistic ignorance-private acceptance systematically exceeding the acceptance attributed to others-operates in attitudes toward tattooed teachers, and identifies individual-level predictors of this misperception.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 1226 individuals in Hungary across four groups: physical education (PE) teacher trainees, university students from other disciplines, secondary school students, and in-service teachers. Participants rated their own acceptance of tattooed PE and academic-subject teachers and the acceptance they attributed to other teachers and to parents, and reported tattoo status, gender, and professional background.

resultsOwn acceptance exceeded attributed acceptance in all four groups and for both reference targets, consistent with pluralistic ignorance; gaps were largest among secondary school students and smallest-though still positive-among in-service teachers. Personal tattoo experience was the strongest individual predictor of acceptance after group membership, and among teachers both age and experience were negatively associated with acceptance. Acceptance was predominantly conditional, structured by a visibility hierarchy in which arm placements were most acceptable and facial or neck placements least so.

conclusionsThe apparent disapproval of tattooed teachers reflects collective misperception more than genuine consensus, suggesting that making actual peer attitudes visible could reduce conformity pressure and support more authentic professional self-expression.

Indexed as

attitudes toward tattooed teachersbody arteducational groupspluralistic ignoranceprofessional socializationteacher appearance norms

Identifiers

PMID42645411
PMCPMC13512391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.