ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Medical workup in pediatric first psychotic presentation: real-world diagnostic utility in a large tertiary cohort.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The medical evaluation of children and adolescents with first psychotic presentation aims to identify potentially reversible underlying medical conditions. However, recommendations regarding the extent of diagnostic investigations remain inconsistent. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield of the medical workup performed in children and adolescents presenting with first psychotic presentation at a tertiary medical center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from Soroka University Medical Center, Israel. All patients aged 5-18 years who presented to the pediatric emergency department or were admitted with a first-time diagnosis of psychosis between 2008 and 2023 were included (n = 235). Clinical, laboratory, neuroimaging, and electroencephalographic findings were reviewed to determine the diagnostic yield of each investigation. The cohort had a high prevalence of pre-existing neurodevelopmental and medical comorbidities. Urine toxicology identified substance-related findings in 19 patients (8.1%), predominantly cannabinoids. Routine laboratory investigations did not otherwise identify an underlying medical etiology. Two patients had corticosteroid-induced psychosis. Neuroimaging (77%) identified clinically explanatory findings in three patients (1.3%), all of whom had neurological abnormalities or atypical clinical features. EEG (48%) did not identify the etiology of psychosis in any case. In children and adolescents with first psychotic presentation, the medical evaluation should be guided by clinical findings and toxicology screening rather than routine extensive testing. Neuroimaging and electroencephalography rarely identify an underlying medical cause in the absence of neurological abnormalities or atypical clinical features, supporting a selective, clinically guided diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42645338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.