Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645338›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Medical workup in pediatric first psychotic presentation: real-world diagnostic utility in a large tertiary cohort.

Jacob Bistritzer, Dekel Avital, Iris Noyman, Gal Meiri, Yuval Arnon, Gal Yenon, Doron Pasternak, Hadar Sadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob BistritzerPediatric Neurology Unit, Saban Children's hospital, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel. kobibist@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-5069
Dekel AvitalPediatric Neurology Unit, Saban Children's hospital, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Iris NoymanPediatric Neurology Unit, Saban Children's hospital, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Gal MeiriChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Yuval ArnonClinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Gal YenonFaculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Doron PasternakFaculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Hadar SadehChild and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medical evaluation of children and adolescents with first psychotic presentation aims to identify potentially reversible underlying medical conditions. However, recommendations regarding the extent of diagnostic investigations remain inconsistent. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield of the medical workup performed in children and adolescents presenting with first psychotic presentation at a tertiary medical center. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from Soroka University Medical Center, Israel. All patients aged 5-18 years who presented to the pediatric emergency department or were admitted with a first-time diagnosis of psychosis between 2008 and 2023 were included (n = 235). Clinical, laboratory, neuroimaging, and electroencephalographic findings were reviewed to determine the diagnostic yield of each investigation. The cohort had a high prevalence of pre-existing neurodevelopmental and medical comorbidities. Urine toxicology identified substance-related findings in 19 patients (8.1%), predominantly cannabinoids. Routine laboratory investigations did not otherwise identify an underlying medical etiology. Two patients had corticosteroid-induced psychosis. Neuroimaging (77%) identified clinically explanatory findings in three patients (1.3%), all of whom had neurological abnormalities or atypical clinical features. EEG (48%) did not identify the etiology of psychosis in any case. In children and adolescents with first psychotic presentation, the medical evaluation should be guided by clinical findings and toxicology screening rather than routine extensive testing. Neuroimaging and electroencephalography rarely identify an underlying medical cause in the absence of neurological abnormalities or atypical clinical features, supporting a selective, clinically guided diagnostic approach.

Indexed as

AdolescentDiagnostic evaluationElectroencephalographyNeuroimagingPsychotic disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.