Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645330›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2026

Analysis of Quality Normative Requirements: Contributions to the Alignment and Standardization of Standards Applied in Health Laboratories.

Saada L C Fernandez, Katharine V S Hodel, Renata Almeida de Souza, Hayna Malta-Santos, Camila Duarte Ferreira Ribeiro, Bruna A S Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saada L C FernandezSENAI CIMATEC, Postgraduate Program in Industrial Management and Technology, SENAI CIMATEC University, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-5867-6175
Katharine V S HodelSENAI CIMATEC, SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Health Advanced Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), SENAI CIMATEC University, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-6672
Renata Almeida de SouzaOswaldo Cruz Foundation-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, RJ, Brazil.
Hayna Malta-SantosSENAI CIMATEC, Postgraduate Program in Industrial Management and Technology, SENAI CIMATEC University, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-5392
Camila Duarte Ferreira RibeiroNutrition School, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40110-907, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2968-5739
Bruna A S MachadoSENAI CIMATEC, SENAI Institute of Innovation (ISI) in Health Advanced Systems (CIMATEC ISI SAS), SENAI CIMATEC University, Salvador 41650-010, BA, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of Quality Management Standards (QMS) in health laboratories is essential to ensuring the traceability, reliability, and reproducibility of results, thus supporting compliance and continuous improvement. This study identifies and compares the requirements adopted in four widely used four standards for health laboratoriesto evaluate their equivalence and contribute to the harmonization of normative terminology. A comparative analysis of the requirements and their applications in health laboratories was conducted. Subsequently, interrelationships and equivalence among the standards were assessed, followed by an evaluation of the terminology used and the grouping of requirements across the four normative documents. The results revealed a substantial overlap among the standards, particularly regarding quality management, risk management, personnel competence, documentation control, and continuous improvement. However, differences in terminology, structure, and scope were identified, which may hinder the uniform interpretation and implementation of quality systems. The harmonization of terms and equivalent requirements could facilitate compliance, integration of management systems, and accreditation processes. The findings demonstrate that standardizing normative terminology contributes to greater alignment among quality standards, improving their understanding, dissemination, and application in health laboratories while supporting more efficient and reliable quality management practices.

Indexed as

health laboratoriesquality managementrequirementsstandards

Identifiers

PMID42645330
PMCPMC13510525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.