ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2026
Analysis of Quality Normative Requirements: Contributions to the Alignment and Standardization of Standards Applied in Health Laboratories.
Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of Quality Management Standards (QMS) in health laboratories is essential to ensuring the traceability, reliability, and reproducibility of results, thus supporting compliance and continuous improvement. This study identifies and compares the requirements adopted in four widely used four standards for health laboratoriesto evaluate their equivalence and contribute to the harmonization of normative terminology. A comparative analysis of the requirements and their applications in health laboratories was conducted. Subsequently, interrelationships and equivalence among the standards were assessed, followed by an evaluation of the terminology used and the grouping of requirements across the four normative documents. The results revealed a substantial overlap among the standards, particularly regarding quality management, risk management, personnel competence, documentation control, and continuous improvement. However, differences in terminology, structure, and scope were identified, which may hinder the uniform interpretation and implementation of quality systems. The harmonization of terms and equivalent requirements could facilitate compliance, integration of management systems, and accreditation processes. The findings demonstrate that standardizing normative terminology contributes to greater alignment among quality standards, improving their understanding, dissemination, and application in health laboratories while supporting more efficient and reliable quality management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.