ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2026
Differential Correlation Across Subpopulations of Single Cells in Subtypes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass cytometers can record 40-50 parameters per single cell for millions of cells in a sample. Many methods have been developed to cluster phenotypically similar cells within cytometry data, but there are fewer methods to visualize activity and interactions of pairs of proteins across these populations. We have developed a workflow for analyzing correlations associated with predefined populations. By clustering blood samples from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and normal controls using an established algorithm, we obtained a minimum spanning tree of clusters of single cells. Using surface marker expression, we identified clusters on the tree that belonged to phenotypes of interest. Next, we computed correlations between pairs of proteins in each cluster. We developed a novel, coherent, probability-based statistic to test differences between vectors of correlation coefficients. By comparing all combinations of the normal controls under the statistic, we created an empirical distribution that could provide a conservative threshold of differential correlation. Using this empirically derived distribution to define significance, we compared pooled samples from AML subtypes and normal controls to detect differential correlations. Given the structure present within this cytometry dataset, we found it natural to consider correlations in this manner versus aggregating all data and computing a single correlation. Our approach has the advantage that we can localize the statistical measure to determine contributions from particular phenotypic populations. Differentially correlated pairs of proteins can be further explored as possible testable hypotheses by considering a population's distribution of correlation coefficients or biaxially plotting protein expressions within individual cells in a given population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.