ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Bio-Inspired Framework for Reducing Appearance Bias Dominance and Framing Sensitivity in Chest X-Ray Classification.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although deep learning methods have shown high performance in chest X-ray classification, high accuracy alone does not guarantee reliable reasoning. A model may still exhibit pathological behavior, such as unstable evidence usage under harmless input changes, inconsistent reasoning across augmented views, excessive dependence on surrounding frame information, and appearance bias dominance, where prediction relies too heavily on intensity while neglecting texture and shape. In this paper, we propose a bio-inspired pathology-aware, factor-aware framework for explainable and reliable chest X-ray classification, inspired by biological vision principles such as figure-ground separation, selective attention, and balanced use of complementary visual cues. During training, the method regularizes appearance bias dominance through evidence-guided counterfactual perturbations that mimic cue-suppression analysis in biological perception, thereby revealing and penalizing excessive factor dependence. During testing, it evaluates model behavior using four criteria: reasoning stability, augmentation inconsistency, appearance bias dominance, and framing sensitivity. This combination enables the framework to go beyond conventional inference-time explanation by both correcting pathological behavior during training and exposing it during evaluation. From a biomimetic perspective, the framework encourages the model to separate relevant foreground anatomy from surrounding background and to avoid over-reliance on a single dominant cue. The proposed approach improves interpretability and reliability without modifying the backbone architecture or increasing model size or inference-time cost. The proposed training process improved the F1-score of DenseNet-121 from 0.899 to 0.931, while also producing more stable and balanced reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.