ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Octopus-Inspired Modular Two-Segment Pneumatic Soft Manipulator with Passive Suction Cups.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Octopus arms combine a compliant continuum body with distributed suckers, providing a biological reference for soft manipulators that require large deformation and stable local contact. Inspired by this functional organization, this study presents an octopus-inspired two-segment pneumatic soft manipulator with passive suction cups at the distal end. The manipulator consists of a cylindrical proximal segment, a tapered distal segment, and a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) suction-cup array. The proximal segment provides structural support and global bending, whereas the tapered distal segment improves local compliance and contact posture adjustment near the target surface. Each segment contains three independently driven pneumatic chambers arranged at 120° intervals, enabling spatial bending through differential pressurization. The distal suction cups are not connected to an active vacuum source; instead, attachment is assisted by mechanical pressing, partial air expulsion from the cup cavity, and elastic recovery of the cup lip. Finite element simulations were conducted to examine pressure-driven bending of the soft arm and deformation of the suction cups under equivalent sealing loads. A piecewise constant curvature model was established to estimate the posture and reachable workspace of the two-segment manipulator. A prototype was fabricated and tested on a pneumatic control platform. Within the pressure range of 50-200 kPa, both segments exhibited increasing bending angles with increasing input pressure; at 200 kPa, the maximum observed bending angles were approximately 70° for the proximal segment and 87° for the distal segment. Distal-segment tests demonstrated passive contact holding on a brown glass bottle and a black roll of electrical tape. Coordinated actuation further produced compound bending and twisting postures. These results show that the proposed design translates the functional division of octopus arms into a modular pneumatic soft manipulator with controllable spatial deformation and passive distal contact support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.