Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645273›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Mechanical Response and Energy Absorption of Bio-Inspired Auxetic Hybrid Tubular Metamaterials.

Sheng Huo, Fukun Xia, Shanqing Xu, Zhanyuan Gao, Dong Ruan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheng HuoSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5919-1089
Fukun XiaSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Shanqing XuSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1301-9988
Zhanyuan GaoSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Xiqing District, Tianjin 300384, China.
Dong RuanSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-0568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bio-inspired auxetic-conventional hybrid tubular metamaterials were investigated for lightweight energy absorption. The tubes combined 6063 aluminium alloy inner tubes with 304 stainless-steel outer tubes containing oval, circular, rotating-square, or re-entrant perforations. Experiments showed that the outer tube altered the collapse mode of the inner tube and produced topology-dependent responses. The Circle-Hybrid tube achieved the highest mean specific energy absorption (SEA) of 6.95 ± 0.04 kJ/kg; the Oval-Hybrid tube was 17.1% lower at 5.76 ± 0.25 kJ/kg but had a 24.1% lower maximum force and a CFE 6.68 percentage points higher. Its SEA was approximately 159.5% higher than that of the Oval-Single tube. A validated finite element model was used to examine oval-hole aspect ratio and inner-tube wall thickness. At fixed porosity, decreasing the aspect ratio promoted progressive folding and increased load-bearing capacity and energy absorption, while an intermediate ratio maximised CFE. Increasing the inner-tube wall thickness enhanced load-bearing capacity and energy absorption but produced more localised or asymmetric buckling. These findings demonstrate that perforation topology can tailor collapse mode, peak-force demand, crushing efficiency, and energy absorption in hybrid tubes.

Indexed as

auxetic tubular metamaterialsbio-inspired structuresdeformation modeenergy absorptionhybrid tubesquasi-static compression

Identifiers

PMID42645273
PMCPMC13509784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.