ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mechanical Response and Energy Absorption of Bio-Inspired Auxetic Hybrid Tubular Metamaterials.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bio-inspired auxetic-conventional hybrid tubular metamaterials were investigated for lightweight energy absorption. The tubes combined 6063 aluminium alloy inner tubes with 304 stainless-steel outer tubes containing oval, circular, rotating-square, or re-entrant perforations. Experiments showed that the outer tube altered the collapse mode of the inner tube and produced topology-dependent responses. The Circle-Hybrid tube achieved the highest mean specific energy absorption (SEA) of 6.95 ± 0.04 kJ/kg; the Oval-Hybrid tube was 17.1% lower at 5.76 ± 0.25 kJ/kg but had a 24.1% lower maximum force and a CFE 6.68 percentage points higher. Its SEA was approximately 159.5% higher than that of the Oval-Single tube. A validated finite element model was used to examine oval-hole aspect ratio and inner-tube wall thickness. At fixed porosity, decreasing the aspect ratio promoted progressive folding and increased load-bearing capacity and energy absorption, while an intermediate ratio maximised CFE. Increasing the inner-tube wall thickness enhanced load-bearing capacity and energy absorption but produced more localised or asymmetric buckling. These findings demonstrate that perforation topology can tailor collapse mode, peak-force demand, crushing efficiency, and energy absorption in hybrid tubes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.