Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645244›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Improved Elk Herd Optimiser (IEHO).

Yanjiao Wang, Fei Du, Li Chuai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanjiao WangSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.
Fei DuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.
Li ChuaiSchool of Electrical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 169 Changchun Road, Jilin 132012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Elk Herd Optimiser (EHO) is a novel metaheuristic algorithm inspired by the reproductive behaviour of elk herds. However, it suffers from insufficient convergence accuracy and population diversity. To address these issues, this study proposes an improved EHO (IEHO). A novel individual update strategy for the breeding phase is introduced to meet the requirements of convergence speed and diversity during evolution. A new population grouping strategy is also developed to achieve a dual balance between elite guidance and spatial distribution. Cauchy distribution sampling is used to generate learning weights, and population diversity is adopted to control the step size of movement, allowing real-time monitoring and supplementation of population diversity. A differentiated learning strategy based on fitness ranking divides individuals into high-quality and ordinary categories, implementing elite guidance and swarm intelligence learning, respectively. A hybrid evolutionary mechanism, integrating reverse learning driven by generalised opposition and perturbation based on the Cauchy distribution, substantially strengthens the algorithm's resistance to entrapment in local optima. Moreover, dimension-masked crossover operations are introduced to greatly optimise the efficiency of population information sharing. Finally, through comparative experiments to verify the overall performance of IEHO on the CEC2017 test suite, compared with other competing algorithms, IEHO achieves the highest number of optimal solutions across multiple test functions.

Indexed as

adaptive parameter tuning policyelk herd optimization algorithmnovel diversity assessment schemeopposition-based searchingpopulation partitioning approach

Identifiers

PMID42645244
PMCPMC13509620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.