Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645214›Full record

ReviewCells2026

Cellular and Microcircuit Mechanisms of Anesthetic Disruption of Conscious-State Organization.

Bernard Kordas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bernard KordasDepartment of Human Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-082 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-5790

Funding

National Science Centre 2023/49/N/NZ4/03958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reversible effects of general anesthesia can be used to examine how brain activity changes during transitions into and out of altered conscious states. Such changes are commonly tracked using behavioral responses, electroencephalographic recordings, and measures of functional connectivity. These measures, however, reflect processes occurring at lower levels of organization, including the activity of pyramidal neurons, dendritic integration, interneuron function, thalamocortical signaling, and glial regulation of the extracellular environment. Anesthesia does not affect all neural processes equally. Propofol and volatile agents interfere with synaptic transmission and apical dendritic integration, as well as cortical feedback and thalamocortical signaling. The resulting activity is not necessarily absent or uniformly weaker. It is often more stereotyped, temporally restricted, and poorly coordinated between regions. Ketamine produces a different organization. Substantial neural activity and complex cortical responses may persist after behavioral responsiveness has been lost, although deeper anesthesia also produces slower and less complex activity. Responsiveness, environmental connectedness, memory, reportability, and conscious content may therefore become partly uncoupled. Ketamine produces a dissociative state that cannot be interpreted simply as another form of the predominantly restrictive state produced by propofol or volatile anesthetics. This narrative review synthesizes evidence identified through a structured PubMed search to examine how anesthesia reshapes conscious processing and why unresponsiveness or absent recall may not indicate absent experience.

Indexed as

AnestheticsBrainConsciousnessAnimalsHumansKetaminePropofolAnestheticsKetaminePropofolapical dendritesconsciousnesscortical hierarchygeneral anesthesiaketamineneuronal complexitypropofolpyramidal neuronsreportabilitythalamocortical loops

Identifiers

PMID42645214
PMCPMC13511029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.