ReviewCells2026
miR-29b as an Anti-Fibrotic Therapeutic: Mechanisms, Disease Biology and Translational Opportunities.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fibrosis emerges when normally self-limiting tissue repair fails to resolve and overlapping phases of injury, stromal activation, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and remodelling become sustained. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) shape this transition by coordinating signalling, cell-state and matrix programmes. Functionally, pro-fibrotic fibro-miRs amplify fibrogenic pathways, whereas anti-fibrotic miRNAs restrain fibroblast activation and ECM production; the miR-29 family is a principal member of the latter group. This review examines miR-29 family organisation, the regulation of miR-29b by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/Smad and additional transcriptional and inflammatory inputs, and the molecular targets through which miR-29b controls collagen synthesis, processing and crosslinking. Direct canonical targets are distinguished from experimentally supported, predicted and indirect pathway components. Evidence is evaluated across fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, epithelial and endothelial cells, and pulmonary, hepatic, renal, cardiac, dermal and ocular fibrosis models. Therapeutic translation is considered in relation to miR-29b mimics and agomirs, local and tissue-targeted delivery, pharmacokinetics, dose control, off-target repression, immune activation and long-term safety. Overall, miR-29b remains a credible network-level anti-fibrotic candidate, but successful translation requires cell- and disease-specific target validation, selective delivery and preservation of physiological wound repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.