ArticleBiosensors2026
PCDA-EDA Colorimetric Nanofiber Sensor for Rapid Visual GHB Screening: Linker Reassignment and Scalable Fabrication.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
γ-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), a colorless and odorless central nervous system depressant associated with drug-facilitated sexual assault, demands rapid on-site detection. Polydiacetylene (PDA) colorimetric sensors derived from 10,12-pentacosadiynoic acid (PCDA) conjugates are a promising platform, but the molecular origin of GHB recognition in PCDA-gabazine systems has remained unresolved. Here, we compare a series of structurally related PCDA conjugates to examine how the chemical state of the EDA-derived unit affects the GHB-induced colorimetric response. A side-by-side substituent screen of three PCDA derivatives showed that PCDA-EDA produced the largest colorimetric response (ΔR = 53) within 30 s, the hydrazide analogue gave a moderate response (ΔR = 34), and a simple amide was negligible (ΔR = 12). By contrast, a PCDA-gabazine mat prepared by the same protocol showed only a subtle, barely discernible color shift after several hours and remained predominantly blue even after approximately 24 h, without a visually appreciable blue-to-red transition. This difference suggests that the accessible free primary amine of PCDA-EDA is an important factor contributing to its faster and stronger response. Building on this mechanistic finding, we replaced the previously used PVDF-HFP/PEO matrix with a cellulose/PVDF-HFP formulation processed from DMF and adopted multi-nozzle electrospinning, reducing the fabrication time from approximately 120 to 30 min per sheet, corresponding to a 75% reduction in processing time. The sensor mat showed a clearly distinguishable, dose-dependent visual response across 0.5-3%
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.