Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42645055›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2026

Deep Learning for Ear-EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface: A Systematic Comparison and Design Insights.

Ji-Seung Kim, Soo-In Choi, Han-Jeong Hwang, Chang-Hee Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Seung KimDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea.
Soo-In ChoiMedical Metrology Group, Division of Biomedical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea.
Han-Jeong HwangDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-1219
Chang-Hee HanDigital Healthcare Center, Sejong Institute for Business and Technology, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8668-3989

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT IITP-2026-RS-2023-00258971National Research Foundation of Korea No. RS-2024-00397674National Research Foundation of Korea No. RS-2025-25419004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) measured inside or around ears, called ear-EEG, provides a practical measurement modality for daily brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. However, reliable decoding of mental imagery remains challenging due to the limited number of channels, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and substantial inter- and intra-subject variability inherent to ear-EEG. Addressing these constraints requires advanced decoding strategies specifically optimized for this signal domain. In this study, we retrospectively analyze the ear-EEG dataset of a previous study in which a real-time endogenous BCI was evaluated using conventional machine learning. Specifically, we present an offline benchmark of 23 deep neural network architectures originally developed for scalp-EEG, which were adapted to ear-EEG and evaluated under an identical validation framework. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic comparison of this breadth for ear-EEG-based mental-task classification. Beyond conventional performance comparison, we identify the optimal architecture by jointly considering statistical significance and a performance-cost trade-off, incorporating classification accuracy, parameter count, and measured computational cost. Our results demonstrate that FBLightConvNet achieves the highest classification accuracy among all evaluated models and outperforms common spatial pattern-linear discriminant analysis (CSP-LDA), a widely adopted and robust conventional baseline, on all three recording days, with the difference reaching statistical significance on Days 2 and 3. Notably, many state-of-the-art scalp-EEG models fail to generalize effectively to ear-EEG, highlighting the importance of architecture selection in this domain. These findings identify the best-performing architecture in this setting and indicate which architectural characteristics support effective ear-EEG decoding. Ultimately, this study offers practical design insights and a reproducible benchmarking framework for developing lightweight and high-performance deep learning models, which we hope will support future efforts toward real-world ear-EEG-based BCI systems.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesDeep LearningEarElectroencephalographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal-To-Noise Ratiobrain–computer interfacedeep learning architectureEar-EEGlightweight convolutional neural networkmental imagery

Identifiers

PMID42645055
PMCPMC13510306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.